T.R. ANKARA MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) USE STATEMENT
SECTION ONE
Purpose, Scope, Legal Basis and Definitions
Purpose
ARTICLE 1- (1) The purpose of this statement is to establish the principles governing the ethical, transparent, and pedagogically appropriate use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the School of Foreign Languages at Ankara Medipol University. This statement aims to ensure that the use of AI supports language development, learner autonomy, and critical thinking, while preserving the authenticity of student-produced language performance.
Scope
ARTICLE 2- (1) This statement covers the principles and procedures related to the use of Artificial Intelligence tools by instructors and students within the language education programs conducted by the School of Foreign Languages at Ankara Medipol University.
Legal Basis
ARTICLE 3- (1) This statement is prepared in accordance with the general principles of academic integrity and quality assurance in higher education.
Definitions
ARTICLE 4- (1) In this statement, the following terms shall mean:
– Artificial Intelligence (AI): Algorithmic systems and digital tools capable of generating text, analyzing data, and providing feedback or assistance in various tasks.
– Assessed Tasks: Academic assessment tools including graded assignments, exams, quizzes, portfolios, and performance-based assessments.
– CEFR: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages
SECTION TWO
Principles of AI Use
Pedagogical Framework
ARTICLE 5- (1) In language programs aligned with the CEFR, learning is defined by the learner’s ability to independently perform communicative tasks across language skills.
– AI tools may support formative learning processes.
– AI tools must not replace learner performance or produce language on behalf of students.
– All evaluated language outputs must accurately reflect the student’s actual level of linguistic competence.
Principles for Instructors
ARTICLE 6- (1) – Instructors must explicitly declare AI use policies in course syllabi.
– The syllabus must clearly state whether AI tools are permitted.
– The purposes for which AI tools may be used must be specified.
– Contexts in which AI use is prohibited must also be clearly stated.
– AI tools may be used to facilitate discussion, promote higher-order thinking, and increase awareness of language use, structure, and meaning.
ARTICLE 7-(1)-AI tools must not be used unless their use is explicitly permitted in the course syllabus.
– In cases of uncertainty, students must consult their course instructor or academic advisor.
– If uncertainty remains, AI tools should not be used.
– Any permitted use of AI must be clearly declared and ethically integrated.
– Personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be shared with AI platforms.
Permitted Uses
ARTICLE 8- (1) -Using AI tools outside the classroom for language practice.
– Receiving formative feedback and revising learning outputs.
– Supporting reflection and self-directed learning.
– Using AI tools under instructor supervision to stimulate classroom discussion and critical thinking.
Prohibited Uses
ARTICLE 9- (1) -Unless explicitly permitted by the instructor, the use of AI tools in graded assignments, exams, quizzes, or portfolios is prohibited.
– All assessed language outputs must be entirely student-produced.
– Assessed outputs must represent the student’s genuine level of linguistic competence.
Implementation
ARTICLE 10- (1) -Violations of the principles stated in this declaration shall be considered academic misconduct and will be subject to institutional disciplinary procedures. These provisions shall be evaluated within the scope of Article 54 of the Higher Education Law No. 2547.